Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> OFA: Why?

OFA: Why?

From: Alexander Skwar <from_at_alexander.skwar.name>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:01:08 +0200
Message-ID: <8iowpa5bgf2f.dlg@a.skwar.digitalprojects.com>


Hi!

In the Oracle documentation, it's often suggested to use OFA to design where files are located. This suggests to create filesystems /u00, /u01,
/u02 ...

What I don't get - suppose that my server supports RAID 5. Why would it be "better" to have 3 fs (one for each harddisk) instead of having one
/data filesystem which consists of those 3 harddisks?

I could, of course, also use logical volume manager to create one volume group and then create /u00, /u01 and /u02 as lv's in this vg. But why? If those filesystems would be used to store "ordinary" files, I could see a use (eg. backup purposes), but not so in Oracle.

My question: Why use OFA? Where are the advantages compared to having one fs which hosts all the datafiles for Oracle?

Alexander Skwar

-- 
Bück dich, Fee. Wunsch ist Wunsch!
Received on Mon Jun 28 2004 - 04:01:08 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US