Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: tough choices

Re: tough choices

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:44:10 +0100
Message-ID: <40d91877$0$278$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>


"Noons" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:40d808e7$0$18194$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > I was suprised to learn that (range/list) partitioning costs extra on
> > Oracle.
>
> Me too, mainly because it isn't true.

Ian is correct - partitioning is an extra cost option in Oracle (though I understand that that extra cost can be close to zero if the deal is important enough :)). It does offer hash partitioning as well :)

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
Received on Wed Jun 23 2004 - 00:44:10 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US