Re: tough choices

From: Larry <Larry_at_nospam.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 04:06:17 GMT
Message-ID: <Zk7Cc.108042$V57.19824275@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>

Hmmm.

"Ah yes. One of those things that never get added to the TCO of the 'equivalent' configurations. Just like Tivoli for even the most basic security. Ah well, in character. What can one say..."

I guess saying "Tivoli is required" is open to interpretation, huh Daniel?

Larry Edelstein

Daniel Morgan wrote:

> Blair Adamache wrote:
> 

>> Be that as it may, no DB2 customer I have ever worked with has used a
>> Tivoli
>> product for security. So, to say that DB2 necessitates Tivoli for
>> security,
>> as has been contended in this thread and in the past by Oracle
>> sycophants, is
>> not just a red herring - it is a scarlet herring, an ochre cod, and a
>> rust
>> kipper. Larry E has worked on Wall Street with both DB2 customers on
>> mainframes, UNIX, Linux and Windows. Larry: have you ever included a
>> Tivoli
>> security package for a DB2 customer?

> 
> 
> No one I can recall has ever said Tivoli was required. What has been
> said is that Tivoli is required to provide the security level provided
> by other products out of the box. Those are two very different statements.
> 

Received on Tue Jun 22 2004 - 23:06:17 CDT