Re: clustering and high availability?

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:30:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1087158634.364416@yasure>

Howard J. Rogers wrote:

> "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1087085200.780169_at_yasure...
>

>>Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Serge Rielau" <srielau_at_ca.eye-be-em.com> wrote in message
>>>news:cae3vv$5gb$1_at_hanover.torolab.ibm.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Nothing to add from my side. Howard, you're dead on what I meant.
>>>>
>>>>Cheers
>>>>Serge
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks, Serge.
>>>
>>>Now, if only Daniel would retract the suggestion I was merely trying to
>>>provoke an argument or indulging in word-games, and acknowledge the
>>>substantive point too, I'd be happy.
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>HJR
>>
>>Make you happy. Let me think about it. Oh Ok. But only if you agree to
>>play nice with others for at least 15 minutes.

>
>
> That, unfortunately, is an Aultish retraction, done through gritted teeth:
> since when does acknowledging a technical fact depend on my, or anyone
> else's, behaviour? Why can't you just say, without the smart comments and
> the reservation they imply, "I was wrong to suggest that; I see the point
> you were making; and upon reflection, I agree with it"?
>
> I guess that's between you and your conscience, and so there is no
> compelling need for you to explain.
> Regards
> HJR
Get a sense of humor Howard. I seriously thought about putting ;-) after the remark ... but thought the light-heartedness was obvious enough. Apparently not.

Ok Howard .... ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)

Now go have a beer and send me the tab.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Received on Sun Jun 13 2004 - 15:30:18 CDT