Re: Flashback isn't, er, flashing.

From: Howard J. Rogers <hjr_at_dizwell.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:41:54 +1000
Message-ID: <40b55563$0$3038$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

"Domenic" <domenicg_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c7e08a19.0405261834.44b486e3_at_posting.google.com...
> I was playing around with flashback and list partitioning on 9.2.0.1
> Windows and had problems with both (obvious bugs). Patching to
> 9.2.0.4 corrected both problems.

But as I pointed out, flashback works on alternate Thursdays even at 9.2.0.1.

> When flashing back, try using the "as of scn" instead and see if that
> works correctly. You can get the current scn by querying
> dbms_flashback.get_system_change_number().

Yes, I am aware of all of that.

I think you still miss my point. I don't need advice on flashback. I would have liked some *concrete* information on the precise nature of any functional deficiencies of flashback which are rectified by specific patches. Just saying 'patch it and it will work' is not what I was after.

HJR Received on Wed May 26 2004 - 21:41:54 CDT