Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Using FGAC for implementing history

Re: Using FGAC for implementing history

From: Vikas Agnihotri <usenet_at_vikas.mailshell.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 11:34:03 -0400
Message-ID: <2gk79pF3pv5qU1@uni-berlin.de> 





Jonathan Lewis wrote:



 > 9i introduced a dramatic change to FGAC to work

 > around a defect in 8i, but introduced a significant

 > overhead as a replacement. 10g introduces some

 > refinements (that I haven't yet examined) that look

 > as if they are the proper fix for the 8i defect.




What 8i defect? What is the dramatic change in 9i? What is the overhead? 
How does 10g address it? Can you point me to the details? Thanks
Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 10:34:03 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US