Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 10g or 9.2?

Re: 10g or 9.2?

From: <olivier>
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 09:14:31 +0200
Message-ID: <409dda5a$0$13087$636a15ce@news.free.fr>


It is time to migrate powerbuilder too ! Which db driver will you use with pb6.5.1 ?

"Tim Smith" <timasmith_at_hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:a7234bb1.0405071346.316407_at_posting.google.com...
> Hi,
> Our small business uses 8.0.5 Standard Edition for 20-60 user
> applications. Lots of stored procedures, Powerbuilder 6.5, MS .Net
> 1.1. We would like to upgrade to a new version and are deciding
> between 9i or 10g.
> If we go with 10g then we are offered RAC free with Standard
> Edition otherwise we must upgrade to Enterprise Edition in 9.2. That
> appears to be the main benefit of 10.2
>
> 10.2 is 2 months out of beta and 9.2 will be supported until (very
> rough sales estimate 2009).
>
> Some developers wish to go to 10g so they dont need to upgrade
> again for a while. One DBA thinks 10g is too new. One DBA thinks RAC
> is easy. I recall Oracle Parallel Server was a bear and I am not sure
> what benefits RAC will give us with our small 2 node dual CPU server
> which already has interfaces/webapplications on the non-Oracle node.
>
> If it takes 9 months to migrate, 10g will be out for 11 months. Are
> they are reasons not to go directly to 10g?
>
> Tim
Received on Sun May 09 2004 - 02:14:31 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US