Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: offload backup to standby

Re: offload backup to standby

From: hrishy <hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: 6 May 2004 02:58:14 -0700
Message-ID: <4ef2a838.0405060158.51ace863@posting.google.com>


Hi Mark

becoz some of the systems i manage are still oracle 7.3.Thats why i was curious about the future..Howard ur briliant as usual in your explanations thanks a ton.

regards
Hrishy

Mark Bole <makbo_at_pacbell.net> wrote in message news:<Bvhmc.60720$Ys3.32442_at_newssvr25.news.prodigy.com>...
> Howard J. Rogers wrote:
>
> > hrishy wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> Suppose i have a 3Tb database on the following version of oracle
> >>
> >> a)9iR2
> >> b)817
> >> c)7.3.4
> >>
> >> In 9i R2 we can use datagaurd and releive the primary database and
> >> make it available whil the backup window of say 15-18 hours can be
> >> utilized without disturbing production on the datagaurd database.
> >>
> >> I was just wundering can we do anything similar on 817 and 7.3.4
> >> versions of standby databases ?
> >
> [...]
> >(so the replication of redo from primary to the standby is suspended)
> >
> >
> >> Can i create a standby database for 7.3.4 and 8.1.7 and then take a
> >> hotbackup
> >
> >
> > In those other versions, the standby database is not active and
> > therefore the concept of hot backup doesn't apply.
> >
> >> of the secondary databases do a couple of log switches on
> >> the primary move it to secondary server and backup them as well..
> >> Has anybody implemented such a scenario.
> >>
> >> I am asking this question out of curiosity wundering anybody has done
> >> this kind of a thing?
> >
> >
> > Yes, people have. But it's a long-shot, because the security of your
> > data now depends on perfect code in the standby database software
> > components. I would certainly be extremely nervous about it in version
> > 7, though less so in 8i. But even in 9i, the logical standby doesn't
> > work perfectly, so you've got to wonder. It would be better, I think, to
> > have an intelligent backup of the primary database, with the standby as,
> > er, a standby.
> >
> > Regards
> > HJR
>
> One question, if you already know what you can and want to do under
> version 9iR2, why ask about previous (de-supported) versions?
>
> Also, I fully agree with the advice to backup tablespaces over time if
> it is not possible to backup the entire database within the given window.
>
> You can copy all the datafiles, tempfiles, and controlfiles of a
> physical standby database opened read-only (or closed) under 8i or 9i to
> another server with the same directory structure (my experience in this
> regard is with Unix). After doing so (and taking care of init
> parameters, log directories, etc), you can then open the copy read-only
> as a physical standby database. In some situations, this is the fastest
> and easiest way to make a copy (or full backup).
>
> Implied in the note above, you can then un-suspend the physical standby
> recovery by taking the database out of open read-only mode, either on
> the original or the copy.
>
> You can also take an export of any or all of the exportable items in the
> physical standby database while it is open read-only, which then becomes
> a logical backup. You don't even need the "consistent=y" parameter in
> this case to get a consistent backup.
>
> --Mark Bole
Received on Thu May 06 2004 - 04:58:14 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US