Re: RAID 1+0 vs RAID 0+1 with SAME

From: Paul Drake <drak0nian_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 28 Apr 2004 08:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1ac7c7b3.0404280701.6eb2034b@posting.google.com>

james_at_unifiedmind.com (James Thornton) wrote in message news:<cabf0e7b.0404272316.536a3d98_at_posting.google.com>...
> As I understand it, RAID 0+1 has the same performance as RAID 10, but
> RAID 0+1 doesn't support multiple disk failures on different sides and
> performance can suffer during rebuilding. Is there any reason to use
> RAID 0+1 over RAID 10 with SAME (or anything for that matter)?

yes, I can think of a reason:
If your storage vendor (preferred?) doesn't offer RAID 10, you may be stuck with RAID 0+1.

Pd Received on Wed Apr 28 2004 - 10:01:36 CDT