Re: Precedence of function over table(s) in SQL

Nilendu wrote:

> Sybrand,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Correct me if I am wrong, but I was under the impression that an
> uncommitted transaction could see the committed data done by an inside
> transaction *if* the sub-transaction happens to be an "AUTONOMOUS
> TRANSACTION".
>
> ~nM

Never. Well except with a global temporary table.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)