Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 9.2.0.4 uptime W2K 6 months

Re: Oracle 9.2.0.4 uptime W2K 6 months

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:36:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4074120c$0$3301$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=0CC30297-D4AE-48E9-ACD0-1343D89CCBBA&displaylang=en did for me for a start

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com/
"Jack" <none_at_noe.com> wrote in message
news:y5Tcc.220$qk3.66_at_read3.inet.fi...

>
> There has been none Critical batch which need reboot during last 6 month.
> Belive it or not.
>
> > I don't particularly care. I just wish people would stop putting silly
> > dollar signs in the Microsoft name, stop making silly comments about
> > 'Windoze', stop making inflated claims for its instability, and stop
> > making equally inflated claims about how long its been up and
running....
> > without mentioning the slight side effect that some of the biggest
horror
> > stories about system insecurity raised over the past few weeks and
months
> > would have absolutely demanded a reboot if they had been handled
properly.
> > In short, I just wish people would stick to the facts of the matter.
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Apr 07 2004 - 09:36:59 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US