Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 9.2.0.4 uptime W2K 6 months
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=0CC30297-D4AE-48E9-ACD0-1343D89CCBBA&displaylang=en
did for me for a start
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com/ "Jack" <none_at_noe.com> wrote in message news:y5Tcc.220$qk3.66_at_read3.inet.fi...Received on Wed Apr 07 2004 - 09:36:59 CDT
>
> There has been none Critical batch which need reboot during last 6 month.
> Belive it or not.
>
> > I don't particularly care. I just wish people would stop putting silly
> > dollar signs in the Microsoft name, stop making silly comments about
> > 'Windoze', stop making inflated claims for its instability, and stop
> > making equally inflated claims about how long its been up and
running....
> > without mentioning the slight side effect that some of the biggest
horror
> > stories about system insecurity raised over the past few weeks and
months
> > would have absolutely demanded a reboot if they had been handled
properly.
> > In short, I just wish people would stick to the facts of the matter.
> >
>
>