Re: oracle 9.2.0.4 on redhat 8 "SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation"

Any news what I can check ??

Thanx

"John Maier" <dieter.brennsteiner_at_salzburg.at> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:MxDac.21$7U.264299_at_news.salzburg-online.at...
> Hi !
>
> I have def. enough swap space:
>
>
> 63 processes: 62 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU0 states: 0.1% user, 0.0% system, 0.0% nice, 99.4% idle
> CPU1 states: 0.1% user, 0.2% system, 0.0% nice, 99.2% idle
> CPU2 states: 0.0% user, 1.2% system, 0.0% nice, 98.2% idle
> CPU3 states: 0.0% user, 0.1% system, 0.0% nice, 99.4% idle
> Mem: 1030564K av, 92608K used, 937956K free, 0K shrd, 9424K
> buff
> Swap: 1887556K av, 0K used, 1887556K free 42484K
> cached
>
>
> Memoray: 1 GB SWAP 1,8 GB , 4 CPU ...
>
> Any other suggestions ?
>
>
>
> "Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:406aa998$0$16966$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> >
> > "Josef Maier" <mmmaier41_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:406aa069$0$19638$91cee783_at_newsreader02.highway.telekom.at...
> > > Hi !
> > >
> > > Swap :
> > >
> > > Filename Type Size Used
Priority
> > > /dev/sdb1 partition 8032460 0 -1
> > > /dev/sda10 partition 602396 0 -2
> > > /dev/sdb4 partition 8032492 0 -3
> > >
> >
> > Perhaps you could translate that into English for me. Is that reporting
> 8MB
> > of swap on /dev/sdb1?
> > Surely not.
> >
> > It would explain a lot if so, however!
> >
> > Regards
> > HJR
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Fri Apr 02 2004 - 06:43:32 CST