Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Article about supposed "murky" future for Oracle

Re: Article about supposed "murky" future for Oracle

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:54:44 +1000
Message-ID: <406c1396$0$4548$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


Yeah. The only (small) remaining problem is that SAP did NOT run on Windows AT ALL, in 1995...

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
"DHatheway" <dlhatheway_at_mmm.com.nospam> wrote in message
news:c4ev07$obe$1_at_tuvok3.mmm.com...
>

> I noticed they first got rolling in 1995. Maybe they used SQL Server 4.2 or
> 6/6.5? Or, maybe it really was Oracle back then? At the time, Oracle was,
> probably rightly, considered much more scalable than MS SQL Server. Maybe
> they had a multi-million dollar implementation on Sun or something... What
> was the biggest WIntel box available back then? A quad-66Mhz Pentium?
Received on Thu Apr 01 2004 - 06:54:44 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US