Re: oracle 9.2.0.4 on redhat 8 "SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation"

From: John Maier <dieter.brennsteiner_at_salzburg.at>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:52:03 +0200
Message-ID: <MxDac.21$7U.264299@news.salzburg-online.at>

Hi !

I have def. enough swap space:

63 processes: 62 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped

CPU0 states:  0.1% user,  0.0% system,  0.0% nice, 99.4% idle
CPU1 states:  0.1% user,  0.2% system,  0.0% nice, 99.2% idle
CPU2 states:  0.0% user,  1.2% system,  0.0% nice, 98.2% idle
CPU3 states:  0.0% user,  0.1% system,  0.0% nice, 99.4% idle
Mem:  1030564K av,   92608K used,  937956K free,       0K shrd,    9424K
buff
Swap: 1887556K av,       0K used, 1887556K free                   42484K

cached

Memoray: 1 GB SWAP 1,8 GB , 4 CPU ...

Any other suggestions ?

"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:406aa998$0$16966$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Josef Maier" <mmmaier41_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:406aa069$0$19638$91cee783_at_newsreader02.highway.telekom.at...
> > Hi !
> >
> > Swap :
> >
> > Filename Type Size Used Priority
> > /dev/sdb1 partition 8032460 0 -1
> > /dev/sda10 partition 602396 0 -2
> > /dev/sdb4 partition 8032492 0 -3
> >
>
> Perhaps you could translate that into English for me. Is that reporting
8MB
> of swap on /dev/sdb1?
> Surely not.
>
> It would explain a lot if so, however!
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 31 2004 - 11:52:03 CST