Re: Enable 32K Block in 8K Block DB

Jonathan Lewis wrote:

> Note in-line.
>

> I haven't read the paper - but if a lot of the tables use hashing
> instead of indexing, then a smaller block size could reduce the CPU
> cost of hash-collisions.

Could I trouble you for a simple example demonstrating this?

Thanks.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)