Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Poor mans RAID10...

Re: Poor mans RAID10...

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 22:19:18 +1100
Message-ID: <4056e772$0$8359$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


Is there any reason you folks know of for this "magic number" of 16 extents/1Mb?

I'm just trying to figure if anything else on the config of the table/tablespace/db would influence this "boundary"?

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:c35e1i$ik7$1_at_hercules.btinternet.com...


>
> If you are on autoallocate / system allocated extent sizes, then the
> first 16 extents (i.e. 1M) go into the first file, after which you get
> the round-robin. (Unless it has changed since I last tested it, which
> was some time ago)
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 16 2004 - 05:19:18 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US