Re: Is 10g much slower than 9i?

Ramon F Herrera wrote:
> Does anyone else have the impression that Oracle 10gR1 is
> substantially slower than 9iR2?
>
> In fact, it seems to be a minimum of 3x up to 10x slower,
> according to every procedure I have run so far.
>
> -Ramon F. Herrera
>
> RedHat Linux RHEL3

Not my experience at all. I'm seeing 20-30% increases in almost everything I do.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)