Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Linux vs. Windows performance.

Re: Linux vs. Windows performance.

From: Howard J. Rogers <hjr_at_dizwell.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:34:45 +1100
Message-ID: <402d26d8$0$4249$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

"Michael Rothwell" <marothwellRemoveThis_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GeqdnbRkYfsyubDdRVn-hg_at_comcast.com...
> Has anyone taken an Identical Windows box and Linux box (same hardware
> configuration) and tested Oracle performance? I'm looking for some real
> world examples if I move from Windows 2k to linux with Oracle 9i. The
> box currently has 2 1.8 CPUs with 4 disks and 1 G ram. OLTP system with
> tables using about 30 G of space. About 40 - 100 concurrent users, but
> this may double soon. Can I expect better performance from the Linux box?

Yes. It's not real-world testing, but it's testing nonetheless. First time I reformatted a Windows machine and turned it into Linux, I had the surprise of my life. I had to re-run all my Oracle tests in case I had been measuring Windows not Oracle, the difference was that dramatic. I can't quantify it for you (well, I can say test were running at least 2, 3 and 4 times faster -identical machine, I remind you- on Linux than on Windows, but I didn't document that, and as I say, these were private stress tests, not a production run), but yes you will notice it.

Group regulars will affirm, I think, that I was once a dedicated Linux hater. Now I am merely incompetent on it. But despite that, I refuse to run Oracle on Windows any more. It was that much of a shock.

Regards
HJR

-- 
--------------------------------------------
Oracle Insights: www.dizwell.com
--------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Feb 13 2004 - 13:34:45 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US