Re: Options for wide-area database?

From: Ernest Siu <ernestsiu_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 13 Feb 2004 09:06:51 -0800
Message-ID: <2833144d.0402130906.839617f@posting.google.com>

More input on this? Has anybody deploy a wide-area RAC? If it is implementable with reasonable performance, it implies DR, load-balancing and 'replacing' advanced replication.

Ernest

ernestsiu_at_yahoo.com (Ernest Siu) wrote in message news:<2833144d.0402051044.9feed4_at_posting.google.com>...
> What are the pros/cons for the following options in implementing a
> wide-area oracle (e.g. 100-1000 miles apart)? In terms of cost,
> performance and data consistency?
>
> 1. Single-site single-server (big!) with remote clients
> 2. Single-site multi-servers using RAC with remote clients
> 3. Single-site server(s) (option 1 or 2) with advanced replication
> onto remote hosts
> 4. Multi-site servers with RAC and wide-area SAN
>
> Any comment/suggestion?
> Ernest
Received on Fri Feb 13 2004 - 11:06:51 CST