Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Service names vs. Oracle SIDs

Re: Service names vs. Oracle SIDs

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.demon.nl>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 13:47:18 +0100
Message-ID: <oo8n109pdtf32810c8l3frldklo1vti0bi@4ax.com>


On 31 Jan 2004 03:45:23 -0800, newtophp2000_at_yahoo.com (php newbie) wrote:

>I installed Oracle9i (v9.2) on Mandrake Linux9.2. At the moment the
>configuration is not complete, but I am reading the manuals and will
>fix it soon. (One thing is that only the Oracle user can log in to
>the database; no other users can; although I have made sure all their
>environment variables are exactly the same.)

Usually a result from incorrect file protection.

>
>My question is that on Windows (again with Oracle 9i), I can log in to
>the database using the Oracle SID. But on Linux, it only accepts the
>service name (Global DB Name) for a connection. Is this some new
>behavior that is going to be standard from now on? Should I stop
>using the SIDs in my apps?

In 8i, several new features were introduced in net8. Transparent Application Failover, Connection manager, the option to have your listener running on a different server, to have different listeners for your database on different nodes etc, etc. They all won't work using a SID.
Consequently the net8 manual tells you the SID mechanism is deprecated and you only *must* use it for Oracle Enterprise Manager.

--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Sat Jan 31 2004 - 06:47:18 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US