Re: Oracle latest version upgrade...

From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 07:31:58 -0800
Message-ID: <1075476661.116191@yasure>

Dusan Bolek wrote:

> Andy Hassall <andy_at_andyh.co.uk> wrote in message news:<guti101l4dr78q2i7k1igd0mhge6akvcnn_at_4ax.com>...
>

>>On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:35:37 -0800, Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>9.2.0.4 has been out for a long time. There are rumors of a 9.2.0.5 
>>>coming too.
>>
>> More than a rumour hopefully - we've been promised that some bugs we're
>>hitting are fixed in 9.2.0.5.

>
>
> I know about several bugs that got a patch for 9.2.0.4. So maybe these
> ones will be merged (together with others still unknown) to 9.2.0.5
> patchset. Is true that even in 9.2.0.4 there are few stupid bugs
> included in.
>
> --
> Dusan Bolek

If doing RAC ... there are quite a few things 9.2.0.4 doesn't do ... not just well ... at all. A 9.2.0.5 install set that actually handles secondary nodes properly is highly desirable.

So would finding the person that signed off on the 9.2.0.1 to 9.2.0.4 CD set releases and claimed they had tested RAC installation. I'd personally llike to help them to say: "Do you want fries with that." There is no excuse for it ever getting out of QA unless someone was faking the testing or performing the testing on machines still dirty from previous installations.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

Received on Fri Jan 30 2004 - 09:31:58 CST