Re: 10G

From: Paul Drake <drak0nian_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 17 Jan 2004 19:43:40 -0800
Message-ID: <1ac7c7b3.0401171943.5c08614a@posting.google.com>

"Tanel Poder" <change_to_my_first_name_at_integrid.info> wrote in message news:<4009be2f$1_1_at_news.estpak.ee>...
> Hi!
>
> > Get a copy of 9ir2 and practice, practice, practice.
> > It's a good release, with more features than one
> > can poke a stick at. I'm continually baffled at
> > the undocumented little "pearls" in it!
>
> I'm even baffled with the documented "pearls" in it ;)
>
> >
> > it won't be wasted when 10g finally comes round.
>
> Definitely!
> 9.2 will stay around for loooong time :)
>
> Tanel.

seeing that they moved back de-support for 8.1.7 from 31-dec-2003 to 31-dec-2004, I would anticipate that 9.2 would be supported beyond 31-dec-2005.
gotta wonder if that move to 10g will be onto 64 bit AMD or Intel chip.

Pd Received on Sat Jan 17 2004 - 21:43:40 CST