Re: hyperthreading

joel-garry_at_home.com (Joel Garry) wrote in message news:<91884734.0401091442.52680488_at_posting.google.com>...
> Connor McDonald <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<3FFE8015.5820_at_yahoo.com>...
> > Joel Garry wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like I'll be dealing with some dual Xeons. Anybody know if
> > > Oracle performs better under XP than W2K? (avoiding I/O issues, of
> > > course).
> > >
> > > Background discussion of hyperthreading:
> > > http://www.2cpu.com/articles/ht_explored/ht_2.html
> > >
> > > jg
> > > --
> > > @home.com is bogus.
> > > http://www.raw-footage.com/BDH01/BDH2001.htm
> >
> > 10G (beta) is only certified against W2K, though production will be
> > against XP as well I'm told...But that does tell you something about how
> > much testing v10 testing has been against XP :-)
>
> Does it? I think it only tells me they had a bunch of W2K machines
> around when they certified.
>
> However, if they replaced most of those with Linux, you might have a
> very significant point :-)
>
> Now all we need is the 2.6 kernel and Oracle properly threaded to use
> it.
>
> jg

and SCOX laid out in the dessert with its decaying carcass feeding the vultures.

Pd Received on Sat Jan 10 2004 - 10:15:39 CST