I don't know I'm curious about the idea of a certified combination for a
beta product (yes I can see why it might be done - but I'd rebel and try on
XP/2003 etc). Guess in the slang of the spam I get I am OS-Curious..
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************
"Connor McDonald" <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3FFE8015.5820_at_yahoo.com...
> Joel Garry wrote:
> >
> > Looks like I'll be dealing with some dual Xeons. Anybody know if
> > Oracle performs better under XP than W2K? (avoiding I/O issues, of
> > course).
> >
> > Background discussion of hyperthreading:
> > http://www.2cpu.com/articles/ht_explored/ht_2.html
> >
> > jg
> > --
> > @home.com is bogus.
> > http://www.raw-footage.com/BDH01/BDH2001.htm
>
> 10G (beta) is only certified against W2K, though production will be
> against XP as well I'm told...But that does tell you something about how
> much testing v10 testing has been against XP :-)
>
> hth
> connor
Received on Fri Jan 09 2004 - 14:35:02 CST
