Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: why different db cache hit ratios?

Re: why different db cache hit ratios?

From: Frank van Bortel <fbortel_at_nescape.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:17:14 +0100
Message-ID: <bsaec2$9ak$2@news2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>


Ibrahim DOGAN wrote:

> the calculation of db cache hit ratios using following methods produce
> different results?
>
> 1- using v$sysstat:
> SELECT 100*(1- ((p.value - l.value - d.value) / s.value)) "Buffer
> Cache Hit Ratio"
> FROM v$sysstat s, v$sysstat l, v$sysstat d, v$sysstat p
> WHERE s.name = 'session logical reads'
> AND d.name = 'physical reads direct'
> AND l.name = 'physical reads direct (lob)'
> AND p.name = 'physical reads';
>
>
> 2- using v$buffer_pool_statistics
>
> select (1-(physical_reads/(db_block_gets+consistent_gets)))*100
> cache_hit_ratio
> from v$buffer_pool_statistics;
>
>
> * So which v$ table has more accurate stats or more reliable ?
>
> Thanks,
> i.d.

Who cares about BDCHR - what platform and version are you anyway?

-- 
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,
Frank van Bortel
Received on Tue Dec 23 2003 - 16:17:14 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US