Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Changing isolation level? ++ scenarios
Joel Garry wrote:
> vslabs_at_onwe.co.za (Billy Verreynne) wrote in message news:<1a75df45.0312042357.5c158776_at_posting.google.com>...
>
>>The bottom line IMO is information. Provide the business with >>information in order for them to make their decisions. Isolation >>levels are not an issue - not if you use Oracle correctly and not if >>you design your app & database correctly.
I completely disagree with your analysis. Turn the situation around and you'll see why.
Suppose the original application had been built in Oracle where is was designed to be compatible with reads not blocking writes, writes not blocking reads, no lock escallation, etc. It too would work perfectly.
Then you would try to rehost on another RDBMS and you'd have the exact same complaint.
The point is not that one is right and one wrong. Not that one is better and one worse. Rather that each is different and intelligent people read the Concepts books, read the Architecture books, and make modifications to optimize their work for the tool they are using. Same as there is nothing that makes screws better than nails but you won't get very far trying to get nails into a 2x4 with a screwdriver.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Fri Dec 05 2003 - 16:01:54 CST