Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: new posts to an old issue

Re: new posts to an old issue

From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 3 Dec 2003 11:10:36 -0800
Message-ID: <91884734.0312031110.76443136@posting.google.com>


"Richard Foote" <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message news:<BH_yb.36357$aT.30536_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
> "yls177" <yls177_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:c06e4d68.0312011833.69994473_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=3f927ab3%240%2436
> 99%24afc38c87%40news.optusnet.com.au&rnum=8&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dyls177%2Bgrou
> p:comp.databases.oracle.server%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26group%3Dcomp
> .databases.oracle.server%26scoring%3Dd
> >
> >
> > hi, from the above... i cant post to that again. so have to link these
> > two together...
> >
> > basically... its like this
> >
> > recently.. my colleagues have come up with 2 shutdown procedures and
> > are as belows
> >
> > 1)
> > alter system switch logfile
> > alter system checkpoint
> > shutdown abort
> > startup restrict
> > shutdown immediate
> >
> >
> > 2)
> > alter system switch logfile
> > alter system checkpoint
> > shutdown immediate
> >
>
> This has all been discussed to death previously but I'm curious about the
> benefits of performing the checkpoint in either scenario.
>
> In scenario 1 it kinda defeats the "purpose" of the shutdown abort and could
> result in more cleaning out of uncommitted changes on disk ?

Depends what "purpose" you mean. I think the OP here is just talking about general shutting down, rather than for some emergency purpose like the disk is about to fail or a DNS attack blowing in transactions. So in general shutting down, there shouldn't be too many uncommited changes between the switch and explicit checkpoint. In a real emergency (THE FLOODWATERS ARE RISING!), someone would need to make a split-second decision about whether to try to keep current transactions.

>
> In scenario 2, an implicit checkpoint is performed regardless ?

Doesn't the switch logfile imply them in both?

>
> Just curious in what your colleague's reasoning.
>
> Cheers
>
> Richard

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/tue/business/news_1b2boeing.html
Received on Wed Dec 03 2003 - 13:10:36 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US