With a little further thought on the subject I realised that PUBLIC cannot
be considered true ROLE because you can't GRANT it, or REVOKE it, SET it,
etc. So, I guess the OEM developers consider it to be more like a USER than
a ROLE.
"Mladen Gogala" <mgogala_at_adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2003.11.30.22.26.05.357540_at_adelphia.net...
> On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:30:41 +0000, Michael J. Moore wrote:
>
> >
> > It's a type 0 user just like all of the other ROLEs.
> > So, I wonder why OEM treats it like a user when it has more of the
> > characteristics of a ROLE. (Just thinking out loud here, not really
> > expecting an answer).
>
> Let me paraphrase Miss Jessica Rabbit of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" fame:
> OEM is just programmed that way. Further questions should be sent to
> lellison_at_oracle.com.
>
> --
> None of us is as dumb as all of us.
> (http://www.despair.com/meetings.html)
>
Received on Sun Nov 30 2003 - 17:47:49 CST
