Re: Running Instances on Windoz

Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1069804128.622126_at_yasure>...
> Joel Garry wrote:
>
>
> > Well, I'd still like to see someone honestly compare Windows and
> > Linux. Particularly some replicable ordinary hardware configuration
> > that runs good on Linux and crappy on Windows.
> >
> > jg
> > --
> > @home.com is bogus.
> > RSTS rulez!
>
> Been done. Been done at Boeing. Been done at AT&T. Been done at
> amazon.com to name just a few.
>
> They'll not publish results and those that have them are precluded from
> doing so by NDA.
>
> But looking at the decisions being made, and where they are spending
> their dollars, should give a strong indication of what those results were.

_I_ certainly believe that. But for management, that's kinda like saying "I have a piece of paper here that I can't show you that has the names of a whole bunch of communist^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsqlserver sympathizers on it."

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20031121-9999_1m21jfklocal.html