Re: number of redolog groups

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:10:10 -0800, Daniel Morgan
><damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I see no point in having more than two groups.
>>I see a lot of point in having more than two members to a group.
>>Or am I having an attack of syntax dyslexia?
>>
>>
>
>You have.
>There is no point in having more than two members.
>There is a lot of point in having more than 2 groups, which is
>largely determined by how write-intensive your instance is.
>
>
>--
>Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
>

Thanks for the corrction.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)