Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 11h

Re: Oracle 11h

From: Joel Garry <joel-garry_at_home.com>
Date: 30 Oct 2003 16:16:42 -0800
Message-ID: <91884734.0310301616.11cf8ddd@posting.google.com>


Daniel Morgan <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:<1067473384.885366_at_yasure>...
> Brian Peasland wrote:
>
> >>I'm still waiting to see which vendor flinches first when they get to
> >>13. We will see which
> >>runs deeper ... logic or numerologic superstition.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >That's when they go to very large numbers........3480....Does anything
> >really think that IBM had 3,479 tape drives out there before the 3480's
> >were introduced??? Or stupid names........95....98.....ME....XP.....
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Brian
> >
> >
> Well if you want to look at Windows names get the right one's and get
> them in the correct
> order:
>
> Windows CE
> Windows ME
> Windows NT
>
> CE ... then ME ... then NT ... CEMENT. ;-)

LOL! XP is like French Kissing CEMENT!

http://www.astro.umd.edu/~marshall/smileys.html

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
-<>--=|=---^-'-`~'--+--8---#--/\--/o_----\0/----'`._,'`._,'-
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 18:16:42 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US