VC wrote:
>Ben,
>
>Let me simplify my explanation since, as someone correctly pointed out, you
>are probably unfamiliar with Oracle block dumps.
>
>Please ignore the Oracle documentation for now since it does not reflect
>what is happening in reality regarding initrans/maxtrans in 9i. The
>behaviour is as follows:
>
>When you specify initrans from two to whatever, the requested number of
>transaction slots is created;
>When you specify one slot, two are created anyway.
>
>Rgds.
>
>
>"ben brugman" <ben_at_niethier.nl> wrote in message
>news:bnrk8j$fq$1_at_reader08.wxs.nl...
>
>
>>>You are assuming that your interpretation of MINTRANS and MAXTRANS is as
>>>you
>>>think it is. I'd suggest going to http://tahiti.oracle.com and
>>>researching the subject more.
>>>
>>>
>>Thanks for pointing this out to me,
>>from the other mails I learned indeed that a 1 should be interpreted as a
>>
>>
>2,
>
>
>>my interpretation was indeed wrong.
>>Although I tried to go to the place you pointed, before I even got close
>>to an answer I needed an account, so I did not persue that route.
>>I do not know if I would be able to find such an anwser from the web
>>pages you pointed me to.
>>
>>thanks,
>>ben brugman
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>--
>>>Daniel Morgan
>>>http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
>>>http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
>>>damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
>>>(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
>>>
>>>
>>>
In short ... 1 = 2 and 2 = 2.
--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Thu Oct 30 2003 - 16:52:36 CST
