Mike Ault wrote:
>domenicg_at_hotmail.com (Domenic G.) wrote in message news:<c7e08a19.0310281130.75d08793_at_posting.google.com>...
>
>
>>How much memory do you have on each node? If you have lots to spare,
>>then keep it in dedicated mode. If not, you can move to MTS.
>>Nowadays, using MTS isn't really necessary unless you have thousands
>>of concurrent connections that sit there mostly idle most of the time.
>> That's because machines now come with 4 GB + of memory.
>>
>>Domenic.
>>
>>kjellove_at_nivi.no (Kjell Ove Skarsb?) wrote in message news:<8ca30c79.0310280602.4fb5ba4_at_posting.google.com>...
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>We have configured a Oracle 9.2.0.4 RAC solution for a customer. There
>>>are two instances and two nodes in the solution.
>>>As of today there are no more than 100 sessions running on each of the
>>>instances. As of today all connections are establised as dedicated. No
>>>dispatcher is configured. However, we are in a process of deploying a
>>>online booking solution, where we have no control over the number of
>>>connections that will be established. So the question is really, are
>>>there any special considerations that has to be considered before
>>>implementing MTS. Or can this be done on each of the nodes as they
>>>were part of a standard oracle 9i server, with one instances, one
>>>database and so on.
>>>
>>>all help will be appreciated.
>>>
>>>Kjell Ove Skarsbø
>>>
>>>
>
>You can use CMAN to concentrate the connections, I assume you will be
>coming in with some apps server, you can establish a pool of
>connections to the database that are shared to the apps server. Take a
>look at "racle9i RAC
>Oracle Real Application Clusters Configuration and Internals" from
>www.rampant.cc for more information on RAC.
>
>Mike Ault
>
>
Welcome back.
--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
Received on Tue Oct 28 2003 - 18:25:05 CST
