Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle 11h
shouldn't that be a public apology for dbms_job....
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission Uk "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:1067325473.451903_at_yasure...Received on Tue Oct 28 2003 - 05:17:48 CST
> mcstock wrote:
>
> >8i, 9i, 10g, ... i believe the sequence would be 11g, 12e .. or do we
have
> >to factor v4 thru v7 into the pattern?
> >
> >"Domenic G." <domenicg_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:c7e08a19.0310271706.6acab5c0_at_posting.google.com...
> >
> >
> >>I don't know about ya'll, but I've heard so much 10g hype, I can only
> >>wonder what awaits us in 11h.
> >>
> >>
> And at the same time changing the name of Context, I mean Intermedia, I
> mean Oracle Text to ....?
>
> So much time to change product names and not five minutes to put an
> advertisement in the industry
> press about UTL_SMTP and DBMS_JOB.
>
> --
> Daniel Morgan
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
> damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
>