Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Quick questions on direct insert, undo and parallel prosessing

Re: Quick questions on direct insert, undo and parallel prosessing

From: Sybrand Bakker <gooiditweg_at_sybrandb.nospam.demon.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:38:22 +0100
Message-ID: <creqpvc0kqetnmvffchp9d51vlv1ucr050@4ax.com> 





On 23 Oct 2003 11:09:00 -0700, jbradshaw777_at_yahoo.com (John) wrote:



>As to the undo tbs, I sort of asociate it with AUM. And I don't seem

>to see a lot of benefits in using AUM. So it makes me wonder why

>ORACLE come up with this feature.




To get rid of the need to have a DBA manage improperly sized rollback
segments.


Needless to say you still can use rollback segments, but why staying
in the stone age? Use AUM and ora-1555 will be a thing of the past.



--
Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA


Received on Mon Oct 27 2003 - 09:38:22 CST












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US