Re: N to M relationship table and indexes

From: Luc Gyselinck <Luc.Gyselinck_at_nospampandora.be>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:36:21 GMT
Message-ID: <Vj_kb.93717$de6.4490373@phobos.telenet-ops.be>

Thanks

> However, if you are confused about unique/non-unique .. then unique
> definitely.

I made the same remark but they were not conviced, snip :(

Luc Received on Mon Oct 20 2003 - 18:36:21 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Drake: "Re: Can sombody list disadvantages of using Optimal setting for Rollback segs."
Previous message: Anurag Varma: "Re: Optimizer goal by schema, dbms_system proc??"
In reply to: Anurag Varma: "Re: N to M relationship table and indexes"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US