Re: Oracle 9.2 Installation Question

Hi Pete,

that's a good idea about the symbolic link. I think I'll do that.

Many thanks.

Ed.

empete2000_at_yahoo.com (Pete's) wrote in message news:<6724a51f.0310200543.b84865c_at_posting.google.com>...
> I'd go ahead and put it where you can. However, in order to
> facilitate your move later, why not put a symbolic link pointing to
> where it is, but, that symbolic link be in the filesystem you want it
> to eventually reside.
>
> For example, it will intially reside on a /u08 filesystem, but, the
> final home will be in /u01/app/oracle/product.
>
> /u01/app/oracle/product/9.2.0 -> /u08/app/oracle/product/9.2.0
>
> Initially, the 9.2.0 in /u01 would be a symlink over to /u08, then
> later, you can move the software on /u08 to /u01.
>
> HTH,
> Pete's
>
> The opinions here are mine and not that of my employer. Use any
> advice given at your own risk.
>
>
> edward.mcmonagle_at_ntu.ac.uk (Ed_Zep) wrote in message news:<4e489625.0310200248.25e90ed4_at_posting.google.com>...
> > Hi.
> >
> > I need to install Oracle 9.2 onto onto one of our Production boxes
> > (Solaris 2.6). I'm aware of OFA, but unfortunately until the discs are
> > reorganised in three weeks, I'm going to have to put the Oracle
> > software on either the same disk group as the datafiles or on the same
> > disk group as one of the redo logs.
> >
> > I hasten to add this is only temporary but could someone say, in a
> > ball park way, which would be the lesser of the two evils?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Ed.
Received on Mon Oct 20 2003 - 16:51:32 CDT