Re: Thee is a problem here I am sorry to have to report.

Richard Foote wrote:

>"Jitendra Patel" <coldrainandsnow_at_lycos.com> wrote in message
>news:7610580f.0310120446.27d63a93_at_posting.google.com...
>
>
>>>Needless to say there is an obvious problem here. One that goes far
>>>
>>>
>beyond the previous concerns about trolling, insults, and abusive off-topic
>remarks.
>
>
>>Mr. Morgan,
>>
>>Observe below is it is FORUM MEMBERS doing the attacking.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Hi Jitendra,
>
>You really have no idea do you ?
>
>How about a little technical challenge !!
>
>How about you defend the TUSC God you worship from these awful "attacks"
>(your term) you so denounce by suppling a technically factual
>explanation/defence instead of the boring and rather juvenile tripe you
>usually dish up. Here's a chance to prove the TUSC publications correct,
>that you know something vaguely about Oracle, actually post something
>technical and earn some respect, something you're sadly lacking at the
>moment.
>
>Two very simple challenges. Explain why the following claims printed in TUSC
>8i performance tuning books are correct and undeserving of these awful
>recent "attacks" (your term):
>
>Challenge 1) "The binary height of an index increases due to the size of a
>table and *the fact that the range of values in the indexed columns is very
>narrow*".
>
>Please explain how the range of values in an index influences the height of
>an index ?
>
>Challenge 2) "Generally speaking, fragmentation decreases performance by
>10-20 percent on average. To repair fragmentation, you'll need to find the
>fragmented tables/indexes. It's recommended that you regularly monitor your
>database to find tables/indexes fragmented into more than five pieces (or
>extents). The key to eliminating fragmentation is rebuilding the table to
>one extent or the size it has currently grown to."
>
>Please explain how having five extents decreases performance by 20% and how
>having just one extent subsequently improves things by so much ? Remember
>this is in a tuning book that covers 8i but to make things easier for you,
>please justify such claims with either dictionary or locally managed
>tablespaces. You don't even have to concern yourself with the tablespace
>fragmentation such steps would generate in DMTs.
>
>Here's your chance at last. To post something that's actually related to
>Oracle, that supports TUSC teachings and that supports the above claims as
>being correct.
>
>Because if you can't, if you agree that the above is crap, then surely you
>support these "attacks" (your term) as being justified and that exposing
>them as technical illusions is in the best interests of the Oracle community
>and that such "attacks" (your term) may not actually be levelled directly at
>TUSC but at the information itself and at the confusion and
>misunderstandings that such inaccuracies generates.
>
>So Jitendra, are you up to the challenge ?
>
>Cheers
>
>Richard
>
>

You'll not get an answer. The woman (aka Jitendra) likely has little or minimal knowledge of anything
related to Oracle. Rather it appears that her relationship to TUSC is more in line with the relationship
a 12 year old girl has with Brittany Spears. She is an infatuated, fixated, groupie in desperate need of
help. I wish I could be more specific but invite you to use your imagination an read between the lines.

It would be best to just ignore her and anything she posts.

-- 
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)