Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle's Myth: keep tables and indexes in separate tablespaces

Re: Oracle's Myth: keep tables and indexes in separate tablespaces

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 03:26:54 +1000
Message-ID: <3f859f62$0$14559$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message news:3f858a85$0$28118$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...

>
> Though I will go one step further, though it's only a logical conclusion
> from what's already been discussed: one should be very careful about making
> statements about what Oracle recommends or what its 'position' on something
> is. Because the right hand quite frequently doesn't agree with what the
> left hand has been writing.
>

Which reminded me of something:
Do you know of ANY documentary evidence
FROM Oracle about public synonyms being
considerably heavier on performance than private ones or none?
I just had a minor argument at work about precisely this and need to find something "heavier" than SA's site...

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu Oct 09 2003 - 12:26:54 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US