Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle single vs shared database (Oracle 9.2.0)

Re: Oracle single vs shared database (Oracle 9.2.0)

From: Brian Peasland <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:24:20 GMT
Message-ID: <3F856F94.B9D7BBD0@remove_spam.peasland.com>


I hope that by a "shared" database, you mean running Oracle's Real Application Clusters (RAC). RAC can perform much better, scale better, but has higher administration costs, hardware costs, software costs and be more complex then running a single instance. Is that what you meant?

HTH,
Brian

Reto Güngerich wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm actually doing a project and I need to compare the different
> between Shared and Single database
> Can anyone please send me some information concerning single v/s shared
> database on the following:
>
> costs, performance, performance tuning, administration, benefit shared /
> single, disadvantage, security, handling, migration, release updates,
> what else should I think about?
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Reto from switzerland

-- 
===================================================================

Brian Peasland
dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com

Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.


"I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
 the three"
Received on Thu Oct 09 2003 - 09:24:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US