Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9i Problems - please help

Re: 9i Problems - please help

From: Pete <div.kid_at_home.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 19:55:55 +0100
Message-ID: <3F81BABB.A9B0088C@home.com>

> > pop-up "Character Set Not Supplied!! DB Conversion". All log in
> > attempts thenm fail. First thought was NLS_LANG had been fiddled
> > with, but upon checking it didn't seem to be set at all - but
> > this had not been a problem earlier in the week. Don't understand
> > what's going on? Anyone seen this before?
>
> the nls_lang value is an atribute of the ORACLE_HOME.
> you can check its value in the windows regsitry:
>
> HKLM\SOFTWARE\ORACLE\HOMEn (the Oracle 901 home)
> NLS_LANG : REG_SZ : AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8MSWIN1252
Thank you. I've done this all over the registry where the ora9i home was referred to. It had been set to AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8ISO8859P1. Is that a Unix reference?

> Is it possible that you have more than one ORACLE_HOME and that the
> default home was changed?

Yes, i've found three of them, a v8i, the 9i i'm working with, and a 9.2 which is incompletely populated.

> You can edit/view the default home in the Oracle Home Selector
> (Oracle Installation Products >> Home Selector)
> or via the Oracle Administration Assistant for NT.

OK. I've set up for "ora9i". The other ones were called OraHome8i and OraHome92. Is the "OraHome" substring significant? I carried on anyway.

> I'd recommend setting tracing to ADMIN for your oracle client and
> examine the trace files. You can perform that in the Oracle Net
> Manager tool.

Thank you, yes, I did this today. Output didn't make much sense to me though.

The net effect of chasing round in the Admin Manager and the registry editor is that now I get a different message:

"internal error: oracle.jdbc.oci8.OCIEnv_at_424c48" The last few digits

seem to be different each time. I'm concerned that it refers to oci8.

I'm wondering if the 9i installation is not complete. I fired up the installer but the few omissions didn't seem relevant - WorkGroup and Wireless.

> > Second problem: TNSlsnr won't start any more, but again it used to.
> > Now gives message in log file "missing listener name 'S' in
> > listener.ora" All well and good, but no listener set up file has
> > this 'S' as a name. All the brackets seem to match up.
> >
> > Pete.
>
> I didn't use 901 much, so I'm working from a 92 home.
> how are you starting the listener, via the MMC, or from the command
> line?

it's meant to be automatic on startup. Checking is with the "component services" tool. This says it has failed. Disabled that and ran manually from a command line...  

> the NT service for the listener would have the listener name included
> at the end of its name, e.g.
> 'OracleOraHome901TNSListener'||<listener_name>.

...not sure what I should have substituted here...  

> The service for the default listener is named
> 'OracleOraHome901TNSListener'.
>
> when you type:
>
> C:\> net start OracleOraHome901TNSListener
>
> what is the error message?

>

> when you type:
>
> d:\oracle\ora92\bin> lsntcrl
> LSNRCTL> start listener
>
> what message is returned?
> If no service exists, it will create one for you.

... but this says that the command completed without error. However, the bit which mentions the "ora9i" instance also says that status is "UNKOWN", which doesn't seem good?  

>
> I'd recommend using the Net Manager tool to edit the listener.ora
> file.
> If the file is hosed, delete the file and create a new one with the
> Net Manager tool. Then you can create the service by the commands
> listed above
>
> If all else fails, you can delete the service and delete the
> listener.ora file.
> You can re-create the default listener and service without the use of
> a listener.ora file, but you will have to manually set a password each
> time it is started, if you want to protect the listener with a
> password.
>
> hth,

yes, indeed, I can see much better how Admin manager and the registry tie
up. but I'm still missing a link somewhere

Thanks for your help so far, very informative day today,

Pete. Received on Mon Oct 06 2003 - 13:55:55 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US