Oracle FAQ

Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?

Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?

From: Mark Townsend <markbtownsend_at_attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 05:23:45 GMT
Message-ID: <BNQbb.318370$2x.94637@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>

> For one
> thing ... your Oracle
> database will not pick up the phone and call your vendor when it runs
> out of hard disk.
>

Well, not yet, anyway :-) Received on Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:23:45 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stan: "Re: Wait Statistics and tuning an individual query"
Previous message: Noons: "Re: I was hoping that ORA22863 would go away in 91r2..."
In reply to: Daniel Morgan: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"
Next in thread: Daniel Morgan: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"
Reply: Daniel Morgan: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"
Reply: Noons: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"
Reply: Tanel Poder: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US