Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: 22 Sep 2003 22:08:06 -0700
Message-ID: <73e20c6c.0309222108.7775a1fe@posting.google.com>

"Eric" <eric32_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<CNNbb.2548$1H3.177088_at_news20.bellglobal.com>...

> Oracle announced its new 10G database and claims it is the self managing
> database. Does this mean the new database is like Microsoft Office and there
> is no need any dba to manage it?

You're new here, aren't you? :D

Yes, no DBA.
And remember: Oracle also sells
outsourcing of DBA services...

Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam Received on Tue Sep 23 2003 - 00:08:06 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Noons: "Re: I was hoping that ORA22863 would go away in 91r2..."
Previous message: Harald Maier: "Re: oracle 9i replication"
In reply to: Eric: "Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"
Next in thread: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Does Oracle 10G new database still need an DBA to manage it?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US