Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 64k or 128k stripe - 8k block 8 multiblock read?

Re: 64k or 128k stripe - 8k block 8 multiblock read?

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 20:40:21 +1000
Message-ID: <3f6add0d$3$13416$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


"Domenic G." <domenicg_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c7e08a19.0309181631.14ab09a4_at_posting.google.com...
> Quick question ...
>
> Assuming a db_block_size of 8k with a db_file_multiblock_read_count of
> 8
>
> 8k x 8 = 64k
>
> Should I set my disk stripe size to 64k or 128k for the most efficient
> I/O for FTS? The Oracle docs give contradictory advice.

I'd say 64K, but 128 shouldn't make that much difference. Provided of course your tables ARE larger than 128K! :D

If you're running Windoze, you could go up to 512K, IIRC. There was a thread a while ago about this. Some Unix version will stop at 512, others will let you go 1Mb. I think HP/UX.

www.ixora.com.au has some stuff on this.

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Fri Sep 19 2003 - 05:40:21 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US