"-={Giorgio}=-" <leva.md3496_at_mclink.it> wrote in message news:bjvm8m$14tp$1_at_newsreader2.mclink.it...
> >>BEGIN
> >
> > begin
> [...]
> > EXCEPTION
> >
> >> WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
> [...]
> > end;
> [...]
> >
> >>END;
> >>/
> >
> >
> > You're just not accepting exceptions in the right spot.
> >
>
> Exceptions should propagate to the caller until they find
> a handler... in this case having another block for the
> exception make the code a bit cleaner but it's not relevant
> for the exception itself.
But there is no way of knowing exactly where the exception started
from, unless you add code. This blocking also makes it bullet
proof against any change in behaviour or bugs.
I like to start from "defensive" programming and progress
to find the problem. It's a lot easier. ;)
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Sat Sep 13 2003 - 21:02:20 CDT
