Re: can't store oracle Database in NAS based on linux?

In My (not so humble) Opinion.

I use: www.acronymfinder.com

Tanel.

"somez72" <somez72_at_chollian.net> wrote in message news:bgurqp$jgh$1_at_news1.kornet.net...
>
> what does stand for IMO?
>
> thanks a lot.
>
> "Brian Peasland" <dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com> wrote in message
> news:3F326AF7.6631F4DE_at_remove_spam.peasland.com...
> > People have put Oracle databases on NAS, but IMO, it is not a good idea.
> > Oracle likes to keep in touch with the datafiles that make up the
> > database on a pretty regular basis. I've seen where network glitches or
> > hiccups present problems if the Oracle datafiles are on NAS. And this
> > can cause the database to crash. So I won't use NAS for Oracle. SAN or
> > direct attached disk is much better.
> >
> > HTH,
> > Brian
> >
> > somez72 wrote:
> > >
> > > hello.
> > > NAS based on linux ( using samba (CIFS service ) or NFS ) can't
> store
> > > oracle Database? is it right?
> > > I'd like know some reason why NAS is not good for saving oracle
> > > Database?
> > >
> > > but, I heard NAS can store MS-SQL data base? is it right?
> > >
> > > thank you.
> >
> > --
> > ===================================================================
> >
> > Brian Peasland
> > dba_at_remove_spam.peasland.com
> >
> > Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.
> >
> >
> > "I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
> > the three"
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 08 2003 - 01:43:43 CDT