Re: sequence and OPS

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:03:00 +1000
Message-ID: <3f2b02ec$1$10357$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>

"quarkman" <quarkman_at_myrealbox.com> wrote in message news:oprs8vczbfzkogxn_at_haydn...
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:59:53 +0100, Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>

> Sorry for any possible confusion: yes, the ignoring of ORDERED happens only
> in a RAC/OPS environment.

makes sense in a way, doesn't it? I mean, the amount of traffic to keep a sequence ordered between nodes would be horrendous, no? Still, it could at least bump an error when trying to declare as ordered in that environment.

--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam

Received on Fri Aug 01 2003 - 19:03:00 CDT