Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 2 Oracle doubts

Re: 2 Oracle doubts

From: Maximus <qweqwe_at_qwqwewq.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 03:14:28 GMT
Message-ID: <ommUa.516930$3C2.13666582@news3.calgary.shaw.ca>


"Nuno Souto" <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3f21e572$0$31923$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> "Karsten Farrell" <kfarrell_at_belgariad.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.198b3724a538a7d8989810_at_news.la.sbcglobal.net...
>
> > True, the PL/SQL that you use to create a package is "some 3GL crap,"
but
> > it's not evil crap. Java is evil crap. <g>
>
> :D
>
> But don't store much more than about 100 or so values
> in those lookup table key=value pairs in PL/SQL.
> It's not *that* efficient as far as linear scans go!
> DAMHIKT...
Whaddayamean? Associative arrays in 9i can be indexed by integer or string... no scanning required!!! Received on Fri Jul 25 2003 - 22:14:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US