Re: Restricting user access to a database?

tim.kearsley_at_milton-keynes.gov.uk (Tim Kearsley) wrote in message news:<725736ef.0307220111.631e7d_at_posting.google.com>...

>
> Paul,
>
> Thanks for the input - I don't mind a good rant!!
>
> I do take your points also and agree entirely. The problem is, as you
> concede in your final paragraph, that we are presented with
> third-party apps about which we can do nothing. Or, rather, we CAN do
> something, but as soon as we touch the application we are greeted by
> the app vendor shouting "You are now unsupported!" with all that
> entails.
>
> So, yes, I agree, but the real world prevails!

If management realizes how much all these suggestions cost, there's always cheap and nasty:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=listener+log++author:Joel+author:Garry&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&newwindow=1&selm=91884734.0303051732.4f72c355%40posting.google.com&rnum=7

jg

--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/uniontrib/tue/business/news_1b22netscam.html