Re: LGWR vs DBWn

From: David Fitzjarrell <oratune_at_msn.com>
Date: 17 Jun 2003 03:14:24 -0700
Message-ID: <32d39fb1.0306170214.69c7a405@posting.google.com>

Which are, by and large, far more helpful than any of the tripe you submit. Your endless barrage of derogatory verbiage is unwelcome and uncalled for.

It certainly appears strange that you can lambaste others yet provide no useful information to answer the question.

And, yet another abuse report filed.

David Fitzjarell

sdg <nospan_at_noway.nohow.org> wrote in message news:<3EEE9366.16683F_at_noway.nohow.org>...
> What's this, the Pink Panties tag team. You just can't resist reponding.
> Some more of your 'helpful replies' you are always ranting about.
>
> Peter wrote:
>
> > If it is the LGWR that writes the redo logs into the redo log buffer
> > then what writes the redo logs into the redo log files? A system
> > process?
> > If it is the user process that writes the datablocks into the db
> > buffer cache, then what writes those dirty data buffers into the the
> > datafiles? Is it the DBWn?
> >
> > Thanks
Received on Tue Jun 17 2003 - 05:14:24 CDT